Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/web/public_html/bb/printthread.php on line 119
CRUISING for SEX - Low season
CRUISING for SEX

CRUISING for SEX (http://web.cruisingforsex.com/bb/index.php)
-   Southeast Asia (http://web.cruisingforsex.com/bb/forumdisplay.php?f=82)
-   -   Low season (http://web.cruisingforsex.com/bb/showthread.php?t=331255)

biggles69 2nd May 2008 09:09 AM

Low season
 
It must be low season! This week I have had heaps of emails from old contacts/ new contacts / old language teachers asking how I am and looking for money....(can't paid rent this month, can you help me na?) Tourist slump must be bad....which is good news for cruisers looking to pick up lots of boys at bargain prices! Wonder if the bars in BKK will reduce their excessive drinks prices?

sextile 3rd May 2008 11:07 PM

[quote=biggles69;660595]
... .
Wonder if the bars in BKK will reduce their excessive drinks prices?
[/QUOTE
]


-- Surely local logic would dictate that in times of falling profits prices should be INCREASED! :rolleyes:
-- bibi.. --

biggles69 3rd May 2008 11:27 PM

That would be the likely conclusion of an economist / accountant, monopolistic bureauocrat (are you any of these? LOL) but that only works in an ologopolistc model ...its more likely you will loose even more business to competitors who maintain or reduce prices. Demand is still price elastic.

The marketing aproach would be to go for a larger share of the available market by offering teasers to get clients in...and keep them...like happy hour, cheaper prices for Thais accompanying farang, 11 pm prize draw etc

The strategy should be to maximise bums on seats to ride out the low season. Either way long term they will go out of buiness unless demand increases again.

sloot 4th May 2008 05:41 AM

Grabbing market share through price advantage only works when there is real competition. An alternative strategy is to form a cartel and raise prices together.

sextile 4th May 2008 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biggles69 (Post 660648)
... .
1.- ...its more likely you will loose even more business to competitors who maintain or reduce prices. Demand is still price elastic.
2.- The marketing aproach would be to go for a larger share of the available market by offering teasers to get clients in...and keep them...like happy hour, cheaper prices for Thais accompanying farang, 11 pm prize draw etc
3.- The strategy should be to maximise bums on seats to ride out the low season. ... .

1.- That's why I was careful to write: '... local logic ... .'; the 'Smiley.' should have given you a clue, possibly?
2.- Agreed - once the bar has lured-in the customers then they'll be LESS reluctant to leave; hence my agreement with you about 'Teasers.' and so on and so forth;
3.- Agreed, again, (WOW! Such unaminity, whatever next? ;)),.
-- Bibi.. --

biggles69 4th May 2008 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sloot (Post 660651)
Grabbing market share through price advantage only works when there is real competition. An alternative strategy is to form a cartel and raise prices together.

Agreed. Cartel = oligopoly, and I suspect one definetly operates in Soi Twighlight!

Mii_Kwaam_suk 6th May 2008 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biggles69 (Post 660595)
It must be low season! ....(can't paid rent this month, can you help me na?) Tourist slump must be bad....which is good news for cruisers looking to pick up lots of boys at bargain prices!


And if you have them stay overnight, instead of letting them eat with you, you could just let them sort through a dumpster.

I'm going to assume that this somehow sounds more exploitive and ugly than you meant it to be.

If you know some of these guys and they actually have your mobile number and they are so desperate for rent, food or whatever...and you see this as an opportunity to take advantage of their desperation ... wow. That's actually nauseating.

biggles69 6th May 2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mii_Kwaam_suk (Post 660714)
And if you have them stay overnight,
If you know some of these guys and they actually have your mobile number and they are so desperate for rent, food or whatever...and you see this as an opportunity to take advantage of their desperation ... wow. That's actually nauseating.

You are absolutely right and I apologise if it came across that way. My main target was expensive bar drinks, and for my part my tipping poilcy is constant around the year. I can't support them all, but I have given one favoured sweet boy 5,000 baht to get through this month, no favours expected.

Icon , after my mea culpa has been viewed by Mii_Kwaam_suk et al, I think it best to delete the thread.

multiple id's 6th May 2008 09:22 PM

Don't think Biggles came across like that at all.The response to him was po-faced and a touch nanny-state lecture.If I may opine freely.

Mii_Kwaam_suk 7th May 2008 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biggles69 (Post 660720)
Icon , after my mea culpa has been viewed by Mii_Kwaam_suk et al, I think it best to delete the thread.

I am sorry if both your original comment and my response sounded harsher than they were intended to be.

There are a fairly small number of regular posters on this board but, based on the number of people who read some of the threads, there are many, many lurkers who (probably)have not yet visited Thailand or rarely do. They undoubtedly "learn" a great deal from the experiences of those who do post.

I only recently bothered to register myself although I have been reading posts here for some time. What motivated me to register was that I felt too many people were making the boys sound as though they were lazy, dishonest or difficult to deal with and therefore financial generosity when tipping them was somehow foolish. My view is that the majority are performing a difficult job quite spectacularly and when they are treated as more than pretty pieces of meat, they will make the time you spend with them even more enjoyable ... for all concerned.

I realize that no one died and left me in charge of defending the boys who work in the bars or elsewhere, but I still would rather risk sounding like a meddling old biddy than to leave the impression that the boys are here to opportunistically exploit.

Actually after posting my comment I was going to go back and edit some of what I said so it wouldn't sound quite so harsh, at which point my TOT DSL service crashed and only just now revived.

multiple id's 7th May 2008 10:28 PM

I think you are right.The regular posters here seem to be sensitive to the situation of Thai people and don't take advantage.The assumption is that readers know about safe sex and the wrongs of exploitation and the accent here is on fun cruising.It is hard not to become outraged when respect is violated and the financially powerful run amok.We all witness some ghastly attitudes now and then in bars and less so come across them here.

An example of the weird people who gravitate to Thailand is shown ad nauseum on nightly news of the Austrian who held his daughter captive in the basement and fathered children.His holiday videos taken here make you wonder about his behaviour on the visit and hope his liasons were not too dreadful for the locals.

sextile 7th May 2008 11:20 PM

-- Just wondering - were this an 'Ortho-sexual.', (ie. non-g*y site.), would we be writing-in and taking such a benevolent and indulgent view of the Phat Pong, and elsewhere, ladies of the night?
-- Bibi.. --

Mii_Kwaam_suk 8th May 2008 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextile (Post 660764)
-- Just wondering - were this an 'Ortho-sexual.', (ie. non-g*y site.), would we be writing-in and taking such a benevolent and indulgent view of the Phat Pong, and elsewhere, ladies of the night?
-- Bibi.. --

I doubt if there is a correct answer to that.

Since the breeders out-number us by such a large multiple and their pursuits are deemed more "normal" I don't even know if they feel the need to seek out such websites as this to share insights about interactions with the girls.

If they do, I would assume there exists amongst them the exploitive fcuk-'em and forget-'em individuals and those whose objective is to settle into a monogamous marriage with the little woman treated like a princess, and all the variations in between.

I guess world-wide the greatest number of people sexually abused and exploited would be women and girls, but I also think boys are ignored on the assumption they can look after themselves (and also because many organizations supposedly dedicated to human welfare don't want to even think about queers).

I'm sure most of the boys (who are in fact men) can look after themselves more or less successfully, and if things don't pan out they can probably head back to the village and find some haven amongst the family. I also realize some of them pitch fabricated stories of misery to those of us with soft hearts, but I guess I would like to think of myself as being marginally above the stereotypical sex tourist (in residence). In some respects we are all exploiting the economic difficulties in this part of the world, but I suppose you could make the case that these guys are exploiting our need for something not readily available in many places ... and I do mean something that goes beyond mechanical anonymous sex.

Anyway, I don't want to sound like Mother Superior. I just think most of these guys are truly great, although I'm basing it on a smaller sample than some (someone mentionned offing over three hundred boys??). I tend to stick with the same guys for a fairly long time before moving on. I feel better about it all if I treat them kindly. Their lives probably aren't all that great now and in all probability will get worse as they get older. Hopefully, at least for awhile, they can feel that someone cares about them for more than a few sweaty moments in some hotel room.

PS. I realize this is totally irrelevant to this thread and has nothing to do with the raison d'etre of CFS, but is anyone else in Thailand been having major problems with the Internet, expecially TOT, the past couple of days? I went nearly 24 hours with zip and today it's been off and on (even more off and on than usual).

silomGWM 8th May 2008 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by multiple id's (Post 660743)
Don't think Biggles came across like that at all.The response to him was po-faced and a touch nanny-state lecture.If I may opine freely.

You mean like a "Department of Homeland Security" announcement in a US airport?

billinbkk 9th May 2008 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by multiple id's (Post 660743)
Don't think Biggles came across like that at all.The response to him was po-faced and a touch nanny-state lecture.If I may opine freely.

We seem to be having a spate of nanny-state lectures lately, no?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0