~

Not up to the challenge? No guts, no glory. I invited you to publicly repudiate the practice of legitimizing political blackmail and intimidation to silence people. Why won't you repudiate the political doctrine of the end result always justifies 'any means' to achieve the desired result? Why are you conspicuously avoiding the issue? Are we to assume by your silence you subscribe to that doctrine?

In the absense of your repudiation of that doctrine, we are led to infer that you must embrace that doctrine. It is very easy for you to go on the public record here and state you reject totally or repudiate that doctrine.

I have no problem making that repudiation myself. I reject totally that political doctrine (the end political result always justifies any means to achieve the desired result). Do you not agree that using blackmail and intimidation to achieve a political result is wrong? The answer is very simple. Either you repudiate the doctrine itself or you wear the doctrine as your political mantra.

I know you won't rise to the challenge again. But, that is alright too.
So, I will leave you with this thought.

What do you think Karl Marx meant when he (Marx) advanced that very political doctrine himself?

[ June 01, 2001: Message edited by: Horndogg ]

[ June 01, 2001: Message edited by: Horndogg ]