CRUISING for SEX - View Single Post

TruckerNorm · #25 6th June 2001, 11:18 AM

However I notice the racial remark of "WhiteSpeak" was left in tact.

But we don't have to worry about the Sullivans and right wing doing us in, it is being done to us right here by "our own" on this very website.

It is sad when it appears to be against the rules to find fault with the moderator but in all the state posting threads it is still okay to advertise for personal bareback unsafe sex - personal constructive critique never killed anyone..but unsafe sex has, does and will continue to do so.

Is Mr Sullivan any worse than a pub that allows advertising for the same unsafe sex and allows it world wide?

Shall we crucify Sullivan and others for what we appear to be doing and/or supporting ourselves by our very silence.

We get real mad when our posts are deleted in this forum, yet we apparetly don't care that most any CFS sex thread contains requests for various forms of unsafe sex and as far as I can see, unsafe sex ads are not prohibited by the Rules, unless giving someone hiv or other STD constitutes an "invasion of their privacy".

I guess the difference is that Sullivan and the referenced websites are more popular in the public eye on the national and world front whereas what is going on right next door is not.

Something to Think about.