Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/web/public_html/bb/showpost.php on line 215

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/web/public_html/bb/showpost.php on line 220
CRUISING for SEX - View Single Post - Dude, Help Me Out...
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 14th July 2015, 02:29 PM
KewlDewd66's Avatar
KewlDewd66
Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 400

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonn3 View Post
Very much "not an option" - there was still a huge stigma to gay sex and being gay back when I was in school. There were no "gay - straight alliances" or support groups.
Yup. Gay-Straight Alliance? No one thought of this possibility or indeed, I doubt that anyone would have understood the purpose of any gay-lib activism. Many of the dudes I was fooling around with did not see themselves as gay. They were just getting their rocks off.

The few guys who admitted to themselves (and possibly to the closest 2-3 buddies they were fooling around with) that they 'liked' it, viewed all sexual activity as something totally private. A notion that a degree of activism was needed in relation to anything that we deemed was purely sexual and private was entirely outlandish. Straight guys were having sex (or at least bragging about it) before marriage, and no one thought that we should have an activist entity supporting their activities.



Quote:
Originally Posted by jonn3 View Post
Well living in the dorms oral was something you could do anywhere - anal took more time, preparation and clean up. Also we viewed oral sex as "less gay" - many guys try it at some point in their life so there is not as much stigma associated. But anal sex, top or bottom, was more like you were "really gay" and could not try and pass it off as two horny youths needing sex.
The notion that some of us had our private dorm-unrelated housing at the gentle age of 18 must have favored the notion that oral sex (if indeed, 'practical') was not really worth our 'time and money' because we were able to get 'more' due to our upgraded housing/privacy arrangements.

Some of the experience must have had to do with the nature of the sexual act in itself. A sucker dude mostly controls the action. If you are being sucked, you are trying to lead him onto the right path, so that you would climax in your time, and we would call it quits.

Tops tend to dominate bttms when it comes to anal play. They tend to be in charge. This is where the power play is really tilted in favor of one of the players. The result is often an increased sense of passion. Even a somewhat average top can bring about a degree of ecstasy for the both players or at least for the bottom dude.

So, we basically shared the view that oral was a beginner's stuff, practical and easy to accomplish but nothing to write home about. Anal sex was the real thing, and if the bttm dude was begging for more, and shouting your name, you were doing it right, and so was he.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jonn3 View Post
Interesting - I never fooled around with anyone where the roles were so defined. Many guys were at least partially versatile. I say partially because there were some who did try but just did not like it. One buddy who we had been blowing each other since we were kids when we tried anal he just did not like it. Maybe I was not a good top but he did not enjoy bottoming. So I would bottom for him when he wanted to - but he would always blow me to make sure I got off.
Eastern Med cultures are very hierarchical. You always needed to know your place in the pecking order. Big dude, big endowment, plus private housing? That could only read: top.

Small, new dude in town, in need of new friends, etc. That said clearly: bttm.

Naturally, this value system disadvantaged versatile guys, because they were simply not a part of the general equation.

The solution here was for the versatile guys to 'agree' to bottom for a demanding top, because he was going to give them something that they wanted: exam questions with ready-made answers; a weekend together, and sometimes it was only a pair of fancy sunglasses.

Essentially, giving away small gifts, buying meals or paying for a cab ride, movie tickets, etc., was the usual face-saving strategy for the guys who agreed to bottom. Small gifts (strange enough) did not suggest that they were pimping themselves out for peanuts but that their role was viewed as valuable, desirable, and worth a special consideration.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jonn3 View Post
Again very different that what I found. Especially younger there was almost no kissing. That we viewed as romance and something to be done with girls (since we were all still trying to convince ourselves and each other we were straight)
Sex, any sex without kissing was deemed, well, infantile. You reached legal age, and you started to recognize that whatever you were doing 'mattered' to some extent. So, you owned your sexual acts, too. If a dude even considered refusing to kiss, he would have been branded a scared 'chicken', 'girly' because he was not willing to put out, and he'd be out of your clique pretty soon.

Every club has its rules...


Quote:
Originally Posted by jonn3 View Post
This was more back in the junior high / high school years but there were guys who might fool around once and never again - and a few of the guys who we did it for awhile - but then he got to be a bit older - had a car - got a girlfriend - and then he would act as if it never had happened. One guy I tried to bring it up and he just sort of laughed it off as "kids". The friendship was never the same - but we did continue to be friends.
A specific sense of integrity is THE single most masculine trait in Mediterranean cultures. You did something - you owned it. The notion that you could come back, and hang around the guys acting as if you did not share some very intimate history whereas you did, was entirely unthinkable of. Everyone was willing to respect that you were having a GF, and that you were not looking to fool around anymore (if that was the case), but every one of your ole' time buddies expected to be recognized as such, in private, behind the closed doors, and all. You were supposed to stand your ground as a man, and the pretense that nothing ever happened would have been the worst betrayal of your manly status.

Naturally, a few men found the memories of their past exploits to be too haunting, and too difficult to cope with. If you wanted to start from a clean slate, no one was standing in your way. You stopped communicating with your 'old' buddies and moved on. No one thought that this was wrong or even unusual. Many of the college friendships were mostly sexual in nature, and if a dude found a more pleasing/desirable arrangement, he moved on as expected.

KD
Quote |