|
#1
13th January 2006, 05:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Icon Quotes ,
*** Spent the night at RAW, eh? Have any fun there? *** They now charge S$25/night for a barrack , if you are a non-member ( since last Nov ? ) Barracks are not clean as before , and bit smelly . As I mentioned on another thread , cannot post to CFS through their computers ( 15min use limit / time )  When I used an internet cafe's computer in Singapore , there was no problem to post (needles to say , it's quick to connect too ) Now they have more Indian looking customers ( young , middle age and old ) If you are into Indian guys , this is the TAJ MAHAL .  Maybe you might find more than a half of customers are Indian looking , if you chose the right time ( cannot tell exactly when ) I got very nice foreplay ( better than Thai guys ) and fuxk by a sexy Indian looking guy .  By the way , a nearby SHOGUN sauna now is OPEN FOR 24 HOURS since last month . Has anyone been there lately ?       |
|
#2
13th January 2006, 10:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Word has it that the owner of Raw is into Indians and that probably explains it.
By the way, a report in anannova.com (quoting The Sun) said this: QUOTE: Ananova: French men have biggest manhood French men have the longest willies in the world. Researchers from Andromedical in Spain found that the average French manhood is 6.2in when aroused. Italy is next at 5.9in reports The Sun. Britons fall below the world average of 5.5in at 5.1in. Countries with the smallest averages were India at 3.9in and South Korea with 3.7in. ENQUOTE So, Ninja, were they 3.9 inches when erect????  |
|
#3
14th January 2006, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow!
This may be an occasion for comparing the smallest and the largest dicks we have ever sucked - not merely saw. For myself, the smallest dicks I ever sucked (and I assure you, these guys were at least 20 years old) were on a Thai and a Chinese-Canadian: I don't carry a ruler with me, but both were not larger in either length or circumference than the little finger on my left hand (I compared them directly). This means less than 7 cm. fully erect. The largest was my former bf, an African-American, with a dick of 23 cm, and thick to match. The range of sizes is remarkable, to say nothing of the amazing shapes of some of the erections I have sucked. |
|
#4
15th January 2006, 12:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Sloot Quotes ,
*** South Korea with 3.7in. *** I don't believe this . Their dicks are MUCH larger ( as far as I know ) By the way , the guy I met in RAW is quite BIG . The biggest dick I ever had = of course , Thai guy . The smallest dick I ever had = WHERE ELSE ? HKG guy . Is this your home town , sloot ? |
|
#6
16th January 2006, 12:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I would certainly take the ananova report with a bagful of salt!
Naturally, dick size is proportionate to body size, though evidently, the variation is quite wide. But I would caution against the unthinking belief that bigger is better or more attractive. The biggest I've seen was on a middle-eastern guy, it was the length of my forearm, and frankly it was gross. There was another one - South American, mixed blood - which was very long but thin and curved, and which didn't seem all that erotic to me either. Personally I find the medium sized or slightly smaller than medium the most attractive. But overall, dick size has never been a major consideration for liking or not liking any sex partner - there are so many other considerations of greater importance. Pic of a Turkish guy: |
Linear Mode
