'offing' two or more ...
 

-- What are readers'thoughts on 'Offing.' two or MORE young men from the same bar?
- My Enthusiastic & Am. Friend is adament that that arrangement does not work;
While a YM. would decline to accompany another & YM. from the same bar - personal shyness? Does not want another YM. from his bar to see what he does or what is done to him? Professional etiquette? Other reasons? - yet he would not be averse to choosing/accompanying another & YM. from another bar.
- Yet khun Biggles - HOW ABOUT BKK. NOW? #270. - wrote that he has 'Offed.' two YM. from the olde SCREWBOYS;
- And khun LikeThai - TAWAN BAR, #248.,(Menage a trois.) - appears, to me, to be equivocal?
-- :)

As always in Thailand you will find both extremes. Yes I have "offed" 2 boys from bars in BKK and Pattaya many times and always no problem even though they know each other. I've had two sets of Brothers this way as well. I choose one who then asks if I'd like his brother, (also in the same bar) to join in !

Then again in BKK and Pattaya I have taken boy No 1, at his suggestion, to other bars to pick up a 2nd guy because he wouldn't like to go with any-one he knew. This I find less successful as no1 is then usually more interested in No 2 than in "moi".

Then the 3rd type is those boys who refuse any 3 way options.

So as we say - it's "horses for courses" but I never miss an opportunity for a 3 way if the boys are keen.

A note on the word "brother" in Thailand as in other parts of Asia -- it means someone of roughly your own age that you associate it -- not one's biological brother.

Always best to off one first, then allow him to select another playmate of his own choosing. Even then, the fantasy is almost always better than the reality.

'Sandwiches' anyone?
 

-- Gentle Reader,
-- Icon, I fear lest you might be all too right.

-- Am I correct in thinking that when one uses the word 'Offing.' in regard to a young man from an a go-go bar then usually a financial agreement is understood?
- If so then it's the Payer who should make the choice for the other partner in the sandwich, isn't it?
-- :)

It is not going to be much of a fun sandwich if there is no chemistry between number two and number three.

Chemistry is always more important than who is paying.

In my experience, anyway.

Agree with Icon 100%. However as the payer you still have a right of veto as it also aint going to work if you dislike no 2's choice of no 3 .

Naturally!

agree with ICON, yes, its the mutual chemistry.
Also: quite alot of the massageshops offer 4hands-clearly with 2 boys. But I understand they just work along one another then- no idea what the more would include then.

Massage 4 hands : I have a fond memory of being alternatively spit-roasted ....;) ;)