I was in a local Kik room tonight when I guy posted a message saying "visiting in a local hotel this week. PM if interested" I PMd him and we arranged for me to visit. I was to push the door open, find him naked on the bed, blow him, and then leave. No talking. I arrived, pushed the door open and entered the totally dark room. I felt around until I found his leg. I followed his leg until I reached his cock. I got down and began blowing him. His cock was long and thick His immediate response was "oh that feels good". I continued to suck and he continued to moan. After a few minutes, he said "I'm about to cum" and then flooded my mouth with his big load. I continued to suck him until he was completely soft and his cock was clean of all traces of cum. When I finally pulled of, he said "thanks, I really needed that". I told him that if he needed me again to let me know. Then I left. I have no idea what the guy looked like.

Quote |

I have known guys that don't want to talk about it - doing the act is one thing but talking about it just makes them uncomfortable....

And even though there is something really hot about the "dirtiness" of this scenario it would seem weird to never even see the guy...

Quote |

I have come across a few bttm dudes who did not want to talk about it. I can see their point. They want sex, not a chat. I am fine with that.

Doing it in total darkness, without having seen the dude would definitely not work for me. I am a visual type, and I enjoy seeing the dude while I am putting my works on him. We do not have to shoot the breeze, etc., but I have to be able to see what I am doing there...

Quote |

I find that younger guys are more open to talking about it than a lot of the older guys - my guess is it comes from the fact that when we were kids being "queer" had such a strong stigma - we would get together and do it - but did not want to talk about the fact we did it.




Agree 100%. That is not saying the guy needs to be super hot or a body builder - but I at least need to visually know who I am having sex with. Not only for arousal purposes but also for safety issues.

Quote |

Who knows? Younger dudes have been growing up in a more permissive environment. They tend to have had a number of mates, some of whom may or may have not been promising more than just a NSA sex. After a while, a dude can get disappointed with all the unfulfilled promises, and may choose to go for a silent MO. Let's fuck and move on.

I have come across a few who told me that they simply do not want to shoot the breeze for nothing. It is about sex. Let's get our rocks off, and move on.

I can also imagine that a few guys may have other commitments and use this tactics to stay on the 'safer' side. No talk. No lies. No chance for anyone to get in touch again, and possibly blow his cover?

Again, every dude is a story for himself.



I totally agree. First off, I am not into it without a degree of visual stimulation. Nope, the dude does not have to be a Greek god alright. But I have to find him attractive enough for me to fuck him. I am totally not into sympathy sex. Call me selfish or whatever...

Sure, this is also a safety issue. There are nuts out there, and every encounter bears a degree of risk. Now, I am not into incalculable risks. It does not take much wisdom to grasp this.

KD

Quote |

I you like anonymous darkroom sex, there's "darkroom" nights at the MedTown spa. There's also, Studs, which has two dark areas for play.

Quote |

I keep planning to try Studs some day - never been to a real porn "theater" - but it is just such a pain to get to Weho from the valley!

Quote |